Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Scott Dierks's avatar

Thanks Alpha for all of your work and your pushing to "actualize" this movement. I have been in the ecological engineering/landscape restoration field for more than 25-years. I got really excited about green stormwater infrastructure a long time ago, but my journey here now has come from a deep-seated dissatisfaction with my professional field. The real promise of it seems diverted back to the same old, same old - money, prestige, etc. The whole Substack for me started out as a way to say to my work community - "you are missing the point and the promise!". I haven't figured out exactly where this might go for me, but the "pattern language" project resonated most; except the "pattern language" concept per se, is not the way I am approaching it. I AM interested in the "story" aspect of this because the old (western) stories are failing us. We need new stories or internalize the old, indigenous stories. But I am still trying to figure out what a better story might look like. Sorry, I don't have a definitive plan that I can stitch in here (yet), but I am definitely, with every fiber, on board.

Expand full comment
Jordan Fields's avatar

Hi Alpha, Thanks for your thoughtful reflections on where we are, where we need to go, and how to get there. I am a hydrologist working for a restoration non-profit focused on river/floodplain restoration, Trout Unlimited. 'Slowing the flow' is the cornerstone of our work. It has been for 60 years. As our restoration footprint has increased (we have projects from Alaska, to Arizona, to Maine) and our strategy has shifted towards many 'low-tech process-based restoration (LTPBR)' projects (i.e. beaver dams, beaver dam analogues, post-assisted log structures, etc.) we have recognized the need to better understand the outcomes of these projects on surface and groundwater storage and fluxes, in addition to our habitat goals. We've developed a 'monitoring handbook' for restoration practitioners and are working on a parallel journal article on how to monitor the outcomes of these projects more deeply/precisely for academics. Few orgs or labs will have the funds to monitor everything but our hope is that with more collecting some data, and with consistent, normalized metrics, meta-analyses will become more possible in the coming years. This is all just a note to say we see the need and are working to bridge gaps, identify questions, build knowledge, and improve communication of that knowledge. Happy to share some of our monitoring guides or discuss, if ever relevant. To date, our monitoring plans are less specifically focused on small water cycle effects, but that would be a natural extension. I'll need to think more about how to monitor those effects at the scale (tens to hundreds of hectares) of our projects. If you have thoughts on that last part, let me know, I still have a lot of reading to do. jordan.fields@tu.org

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts